Estate Assessment · 7-R Scoring

See your first 7-R recommendation in under 48 hours. No agents. No write access.

Connect a scoped read-only role, repository, or database and saasups maps your estate, scores each workload against the seven strategies, and returns a prioritized roadmap — before any migration begins.

Start your assessment Book a technical walkthrough

Read-only access · no agents installed · no write permissions

First recommendation delivered in under 48 hours

Structured export: JSON · YAML · CSV · roadmap view

Connect your environment

Read-onlyRead-only access only. saasups never writes, deploys, or mutates.

Grant read-only access to a Git repository. saasups clones once, analyses dependencies, infrastructure-as-code, and runtime configurations — then discards the local copy.

* Repository URL (HTTPS)* Read-Only TokenBranchRepository Label

Start your assessment

By connecting, you agree to saasups read-only access terms. Credentials are encrypted at rest and never shared.

12,400+

Workloads assessed

across AWS estates ranging from 12 to 4,000+ services

Illustrative

91%

Median confidence score

on first-pass 7-R classification per workload

Illustrative

< 48 h

Median time-to-first-recommendation

from connect to scored roadmap export

Illustrative

How saasups works

Four steps from estate to roadmap

No agents installed. No write permissions granted. No migration started until you say so.

Connect

Provide a scoped read-only role ARN, a repository token, or a database connection string. saasups validates access, confirms least-privilege scope, and begins enumeration immediately.

Assess

saasups maps your estate — services, dependencies, runtime configurations, cost signals, and schema patterns — into a structured workload graph. Nothing is written back.

Recommend

Each workload is scored against the seven strategies: Rehost, Replatform, Refactor, Rearchitect, Rebuild, Replace, or Retire. Scores carry a confidence band, rationale, and dependency context.

Export

Receive a scored estate map and prioritized roadmap as a structured export — ready to load into your planning board, share with stakeholders, or re-score after configuration changes.

Reference Assessments

What the output looks like across different estate profiles

All figures illustrative. Sectors and configurations anonymized — no real organizations depicted.

Financial Services

94%confidence

Java 8 monolith · RDS PostgreSQL · EC2 Auto Scaling

Rearchitect

Scoring identified 3 bounded domains ready for service extraction ahead of a planned PCI re-certification window.

Illustrative · anonymized

E-Commerce Platform

88%confidence

Node.js · MongoDB · Lambda + API Gateway

Replatform

Container migration path confirmed with 6 workloads flagged for ECS Fargate — cost delta modeled before a single sprint was planned.

Illustrative · anonymized

Healthcare Data

96%confidence

Python ETL · Aurora MySQL · EKS 1.24

Refactor

Schema analysis surfaced two tables with undocumented PHI adjacency — flagged for compliance gate review before any pipeline change.

Illustrative · anonymized

SaaS B2B

82%confidence

Ruby on Rails · ElasticSearch · Elastic Beanstalk

Rebuild

Rails 4 dependency graph showed 14 gems with no migration path — rebuild scored higher confidence than refactor at a 36-month horizon.

Illustrative · anonymized

Media & Streaming

97%confidence

Go microservices · DynamoDB · CloudFront

Rehost

Architecture already cloud-native; assessment confirmed Rehost to a newer EC2 family delivers 22% cost reduction with zero code changes.

Illustrative · anonymized

Logistics & Supply Chain

79%confidence

C# .NET Framework · SQL Server · Windows EC2

Retire

Three legacy batch jobs mapped — two had zero invocations in 18 months, scored Retire; freed 40% of legacy maintenance budget in planning.

Illustrative · anonymized

Configure your assessment

Tune scoring to your operational priorities

Every estate is different. Set risk tolerance, cost optimization weight, and compliance gates before saasups scores — so recommendations reflect your constraints, not a generic heuristic.

Risk tolerance

ConservativeBalancedAggressive

Controls how aggressively saasups recommends strategies that require significant code or architecture changes.

Cost optimization weight

LowMediumHigh

Increases the scoring weight applied to compute cost reduction when ranking equivalent strategies.

Compliance gate

NonePCI-DSSHIPAASOC 2ISO 27001

Activates a pre-check pass that flags workloads with compliance-adjacent signals before scoring recommendations.

assessment.yml — example configuration

version: "1.0"
assessment:
  label: production-estate
  risk_tolerance: balanced        # conservative | balanced | aggressive
  cost_weight: medium             # low | medium | high
  compliance_gate: pci-dss        # none | pci-dss | hipaa | soc2 | iso27001
  strategies:
    include_all: true             # score all seven strategies per workload
  export:
    format: json                  # json | yaml | csv
    include_rationale: true
    include_dependency_graph: true

The assessment.yml configuration file is generated automatically from your selections above and included in every export.

Where saasups fits

A decision layer, not another repository or scanner

saasups is a modernization decision layer — not an EA repository, a code-intelligence scanner, or a general transformation workbench. Before committing, engineering leaders typically weigh it against three familiar alternatives. Here is how the tradeoffs compare — objectively.

saasups vs alternative assessment approaches
Criterion	saasups	Manual consulting assessment	Generic migration tooling	In-house scripts
Time to first recommendation	< 48 hours	4 – 12 weeks	2 – 6 weeks	Weeks to months
Read-only, agent-free	Yes — by design	N/A (human process)	Varies — often requires agents	Depends on implementation
Coverage across AWS service types	Comprehensive	Depends on consultant scope	Partial — targets defined resource types	Limited to what was scripted
7-R confidence scoring per workload	Scored with confidence band + rationale	Qualitative only	Binary or rule-based	No standardized scoring
Dependency graph included	Yes	Rarely documented fully	Partial	Manual effort required
Re-scoreable after config change	Yes — re-run with new parameters	Requires new engagement	Limited re-run capability	Requires script modification
Export format	JSON · YAML · CSV · roadmap view	Slide deck / Word document	Tool-specific format	Ad hoc

All figures illustrative. Comparison is generic — no real competitor products are referenced or disparaged.

See your modernization path mapped — talk to a saasups architect

BOOK A TECHNICAL WALKTHROUGH